What is Aether… Space Aether – the basic physical matter of the Universe that fills all physical space, the environment of all physical phenomena. There is nothing in the Universe but Aether. Physical fields (electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic) are forms of Ether motion. All elementary particles of matter (electrons, protons, neutrons…) are made up of Ether, being simply the poles of deformations of the ether medium. Atoms of matter are made up of etheric elementary particles.
Atoms make up molecules and other bodies in the Universe. Aether is a corpuscular medium, the elements of which are ameros – (other ameros – Greek. “immeasurable”, the term Democritus), which is in the equilibrium state of a thermodynamic triple point with a temperature of 2.73°K, which is observed in the form of CMB-cosmic microwave radiation, thermal blackbody radiation of the Ether. Unlike the common name “ether”, ethers – a class of chemical compounds, ether, As a proper name (it is one, one for the entire Universe), is written with a capital letter.
The characteristic radius of the Amer element of corpuscular Ether is Ra = 1.61606×10-35 [m], corresponding to the fundamental Planck length, 1900.
Inertial density p = Eo/3 φo = 2,818 [kg/m3]
Quantum of circulation of the Aether vortex momentum, Planck’s constant h = 6.626176 (36)*10-34 [J/Hz]
Quantum of magnetic flux in the Ether F0 = h / 2E=2.0678506. 10-15 [Wb]
Temperature T = 2.73°K
Characteristic wave dissipation time (viscosity Aether, damping constant, 1 / H, where H is the Hubble constant) τ = 13.8 GA, H = 73 [km/(s * Mpc)]
What is the cosmic microwave background (CMB)?
Cosmic microwave background – this is blackbody radiation from outer space itself, that is, the Ether filling it, which has a temperature of 2.7ºK . The solar system moves in outer space (Ether) at a speed of 360±30 km / s relative to the radiation source medium, that is, there is a Doppler frequency shift depending on the sidereal (stellar) direction.
Any reasonable person will say that there can’t be a smile without a cat and smoke without fire, something must be there, warm, emitting EM waves, corresponding to this temperature. Indeed, the observed cosmic microwave radiation (CMB) is the thermal radiation of Aether particles with a temperature of 2.7 ºK. Back in the early twentieth century, the great chemists and physicists D. I. Mendeleev and Walter Nernst predicted that such radiation (temperature) should be detected in space. In 1933, Prof. Erich Regener of Stuttgart used stratospheric probes to measure this temperature. Its measurements gave 2.8 ºK-almost the exact current value.
But years passed, all German physics was declared fascist and it became “politically correct” not to refer to the works of German physicists of those years, especially since most of them adhered to the positions of ether physics, and not Poincare-Einstein relativism. In 1965, two Americans Penzias (an emigrant from Germany) and Wilson claimed that they had discovered the radiation of space. A few years later, they were awarded the Nobel prize, as if no one knew the works of E. Regenera.
A relativistic explanation of this phenomenon was needed. It was invented by a man of outstanding imagination, Iosif Shklovsky (remember the millionth edition of the book “universe, life, reason”?). He put forward a completely absurd idea, which consisted in the fact that this is “relic” radiation left after the “Big Bang”, that is, from the moment of the “birth” of the Universe.
1974-1980 Professor Stefan Marinov from Graz, Austria, performed a series of experiments in which he showed that the Earth is moving with respect to a certain cosmic reference frame at a speed of 360±30 km/s, which clearly has some absolute status. Naturally, he was not allowed to speak anywhere and was forced to start publishing his scientific journal “Deutsche Physik”, where he explained the phenomenon he discovered.
Only in the 1990s did Doppler measurements with radio telescopes show that Marinov’s speed for the CMB. Naturally, no one wanted to remember Marinov, and so that he would not remind them of himself, the killers threw Him out of the window of the University library.
However, no matter how relativists push, the CMB is a direct proof of the existence of the Ether, a system of absolute reference in space, and, consequently, a refutation of Poincare-Einstein relativism, which asserts that all ISOS are equal, but there is no Ether.
Why is relativism (SRT and GR) not a true science?
True science necessarily relies on causality and the laws of nature given to us in physical phenomena (facts).
In contrast, SRT and GR are built on axiomatic postulates, that is, fundamentally unprovable dogmas in which followers of these teachings are required to believe. That is, relativism is a form of religion, a cult fanned by the political machine of mythical authority Einstein and his faithful followers, elevated to the rank of saints from relativistic physics.
Like any idolatrous religion, relativism is fundamentally false. It contradicts the facts. Among them are the following:
1. the electromagnetic wave (in religious relativistic terminology – “light”) has a strictly constant speed of 300 thousand km/s, absurdly not counted from anything. Real electromagnetic waves have different speeds of the substance (e.g., ~200 thousand km/s in the glass and about 3 million km/s in the surface layers of metals, different speed in the Air (see “Temperature of the Air and the red shifts”), different speed for different frequencies (see “About the speed of the electromagnetic waves”)
2. in relativism, “light” is a mythical phenomenon in itself, and not a physical wave, which is a disturbance of a certain physical environment. Relativistic “light” is the agitation of nothing in nothing. It does not have a medium that carries vibrations.
3. in relativism, time manipulation (deceleration) is possible, so it violates the fundamental principle of causality and the principle of strict logic for any science. In relativism, time stops at the speed of light (so it is absurd to talk about the frequency of a photon). In relativism, such violence to the mind is possible, as the statement about the mutual excess of the age of twins moving at subluminal speed, and other mockeries of logic inherent in any religion.
4. in gravitational relativism (GR), contrary to the observed facts, the angular deviation of EM waves in empty space under the influence of gravity is stated. However, astronomers know that the optical radiation of eclipsing binary stars is not subject to such a deviation, and those “facts confirming Einstein’s theory” that were allegedly observed by A. Eddington in 1919 in relation to the Sun are falsifications. “Gravitational lensing” supposedly observed near distant galaxies (but not on the scale of stars, where it should be according to the GR formulas!) is actually thermal lensing associated with changes in the density of Aether from heating by myriads of stars.
Like any idolatrous religion, relativism is an instrument of ideological subordination of some people to others through absolutely unscrupulous manipulation of their psyche in order to achieve the interests of certain groups of people who are at the helm of this thieving machine.
What is the fallacy of the concept of “physical vacuum”?
Physical vacuum – the concept of relativistic quantum physics, it is understood there as the lowest (basic) energy state of a quantized field, which has zero momentum, angular momentum and other quantum numbers. Relativistic theorists call a physical vacuum a space completely devoid of matter, filled with an immeasurable, and therefore only an imaginary field. Such a state, according to relativists, is not an absolute void, but a space filled with some phantom (virtual) particles.
Relativistic quantum field theory States that, in accordance with the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, virtual particles are constantly born and disappear in the physical vacuum, that is, apparent (to whom do they seem?): so-called zero field fluctuations occur.
Virtual particles of the physical vacuum, and therefore it itself, by definition do not have a reference system, since otherwise Einstein’s principle of relativity, on which the theory of relativity is based, would be violated (that is, an absolute measurement system would be possible with reference from particles of the physical vacuum, which in turn would unequivocally refute the principle of relativity, on which the SRT is based).
Thus, the physical vacuum and its particles are not elements of the physical world, but only elements of the theory of relativity that do not exist in the real world, but only in relativistic formulas, while violating the principle of causality (they arise and disappear without reason), the principle of objectivity (virtual particles can be considered either existing or non-existing depending on the desire of the theorist), the principle of actual measurability (they are not observable, do not have their own ISO).
When a physicist uses the term “physical vacuum”, he either does not understand the absurdity of this term, or he is lying, being a hidden or explicit supporter of relativistic ideology.
To understand the absurdity of this concept, it is easiest to turn to the origins of its origin. It was born by Paul Dirac in the 1930s, when it became clear that the negation of the Ether in its pure form, as it was done by a great mathematician, but a mediocre physicist Henri Poincare, you can’t do that anymore. Too many facts contradict this.
To protect relativism, Paul Dirac introduced the aphysical and illogical concept of negative energy, and then the existence of a” sea “of two compensating energies in a vacuum – positive and negative, as well as a” sea ” of compensating particles – virtual (i.e., apparent) electrons and positrons in a vacuum.
However, this statement is internally contradictory (virtual particles are unobservable and can be arbitrarily considered absent in one case, and present in the other) and contradicts relativism (that is, the negation of the Ether, since in the presence of such particles in a vacuum, relativism is simply impossible).
When some researchers who try to reconcile relativism and etheric physics say, for example, that the cosmos consists of 70% of the “physical vacuum” and 30% of matter and field, they fall into a fundamental logical contradiction. This contradiction is as follows.
Matter and field are not something separate from the Ether, just as the human body is not something separate from the atoms and molecules of its components. It is these atoms and molecules assembled in a certain order. Also, matter is not something separate from elementary particles, but it consists of them as basic matter. Also, elementary particles consist of Ether particles as the base matter of the lower level. Thus, everything that exists in the universe is Ether. 100% ether. It makes up elementary particles, and everything else is made up of them. Electromagnetic and other fields are different types of vibrations, deformations, and pressure variations in the Ether.
The concept of “physical vacuum” in relativistic quantum field theory implies that firstly, it has no physical nature, it contains only virtual particles that do not have a physical reference system, these are “phantoms”, and secondly, “physical vacuum” is the lowest state of the field, “zero-point”, which contradicts real facts, since, in fact, all the energy of matter is contained in the Ether and there is no other energy and other carrier of fields and matter
In contrast to the crafty concept of “physical vacuum”, as if compatible with relativism, the concept of “Ether” implies the presence of a basic level of all physical matter, which has its own reference system (detected experimentally, for example, through the background cosmic radiation-thermal radiation of the Ether itself), and is a carrier of 100% of the energy of the universe, and not a “zero point” or “residual”, “zero vibrations of space”.
What is the focus of the Michelson experiment?
A. Michelson, Michelson – Morley Experiment – indeed, it is a circus trick that has mesmerized physicists for 120 years.
The fact is that in its statement and conclusions, a substitution was made, similar to the substitution in the school comic task for ingenuity, in which the question is asked: – How many apples are there on a birch tree, if there are 5 of them on one branch, 10 on another branch, and so on At the same time, the attention of students is deliberately distracted from the fundamental fact that apples do not grow on a birch tree, in principle.
Michelson’s experiment raises the question of the motion of the Ether relative to an interferometer at rest in a laboratory system. However, if we are looking for Ether as the basic matter that makes up the entire substance of the interferometer, the laboratory, and the Earth as a whole, then, naturally, the Ether will also be stationary, since the earth’s substance is just a certain way structured Ether, and can not move relative to itself in any way.
It is surprising that this circus trick has captured the minds of physicists for 120 years in all seriousness, although its prototypes are in fairy tales-fables of all peoples of all times, including Baron Munchausen, who pulled himself out of the swamp by the hair, and designed to show children possible scams and thereby protect them in adulthood.
Why are “black holes” a fiction?
According to relativistic mythologyblack hole, black holes – a region in space-time whose gravitational attraction is so great that even objects moving at the speed of light (including quanta of light itself) cannot leave it. The boundary of this region is called the event horizon, and its characteristic size is called the gravitational radius. In the simplest case of a spherically symmetric black hole, it is equal to the Schwarzschild radius.
The myth of black holes is a product of the myth of the photon – the Cannonball. This myth was born in ancient times. It was developed mathematically in the works of Isaac Newton in the form of the corpuscular theory of light. The light corpuscle was assigned a mass. From this it followed that at high accelerations of free fall, it is possible to turn the trajectory of a light beam backwards, along a parabola, as happens with a Cannonball in the gravitational field of the Earth.
This is where fairy tales about the “Schwarzschild radius”, “Hawking black holes” and so on were born. However, these tales are somewhat older. In 1795, the mathematician Pierre Simon Laplace wrote:
“If the diameter of a luminous star with the same density as the Earth were 250 times greater than the diameter of the Sun, then due to the attraction of the star, none of the rays emitted by it could reach us; therefore, it is possible that the largest of the luminous bodies are invisible for this reason.”[citation from Braginsky V. B., Polnarev A. G. Amazing gravity, Moscow, Nauka publ., 1985]
However, as it turned out in the 20th century, the photon has no mass and cannot interact with the gravitational field as a weighty substance.
The tale of the angular deflection of a light beam near the Sun, revived Einstein in the early 20th century and taken up by an apologist for relativism Eddington is still considered a science.
In reality, no gravitational field can irreversibly change the optical radiation vector, much less reverse it. This would violate the law of conservation of momentum. There are only the phenomena of transverse beam drift, known as the James Bradley stellar aberration and the George Nikitin phenomenon, in which the optical radiation pulse vector is unchanged, there is only a Galilean addition of velocities and the apparent change in angle caused by this.
The absence of a real irreversible rotation of optical radiation is very easy to check. This can be seen with a good telescope. When covering the optical radiation of a distant star with a near star, two images of the distant star should appear: one is delayed from the sunset side of the distant star, and the other is ahead, from the sunrise side, and if there is no coverage, but the beam passes close, the visible curvature of the trajectory of the distant star. This is not observed in any of the cases of coverage of eclipsing binary stars (today there are more than 500 pairs).
Fig. 1. an Imaginary but not realizable experiment on bifurcation of the image of a covered star.
When relativists consider strong gravitational fields, they forget that the limiting gravitational potential is the square of the velocity of electromagnetic waves, and it can never be overcome, even in a consistent relativistic theory.
In reality, when flying in relatively weak gravitational fields, such as those created by the Earth and the Sun, electromagnetic waves of the optical range experience only a weak gravitational frequency change corresponding to the difference in the gravitational potentials of the radiation and reception points. Here we can write
where φ is the gravitational potential on the surface of a celestial body, γ is the gravitational constant, M is the mass of the celestial body, R is its radius; F0 is the frequency of an electromagnetic wave on the radiation surface, and f is the frequency of the same quantum when receiving it far from the celestial body.
The validity of expressions (1) has been verified many times, including by a series of experiments similar to the pound – Rebka experiment and the measurement of the displacement of Fraunhofer lines on The solar limb. If we accept the reasonable position that all the material is made of matter (Ether), that is only part of it, and matter itself everywhere constant and corresponds to the maximum in relation to its parts – a variety of formations, the gravitational potential c2, then the ratio of the potentials in (1) is inevitably going to be less than 1.
Indeed, we write down the definition of ZZ = (f0 – f)/f
hence and from (1) we obtain
orφ/c2 = (Z-1 + 1)-1 < 1
This explains the impossibility of” black holes “and the meaninglessness of the”Schwarzschild radius”. A photon, even from the strongest gravitational fields, should leave, losing only part of the energy to overcome the gravitational potential. That is, for an observer located far from a massive celestial body, a photon emitted from the surface of this body will have a redshift that uniquely depends on the M/R ratio (see figure 2.)φ = γM/R = γρ4πR2/3 = γρS/3
where p is the average density of the celestial body; S is the surface area of the body.
Figure 2. Relation between the gravitational potential and the gravitational Z.
Why is lensing not “gravilining”?
According to relativistic mythologyGravitational lensing – a physical phenomenon associated with the deviation of optical radiation in the gravity field. Gravitational lenses explain the formation of multiple images of the same astronomical object (quasars, galaxies) when another galaxy or cluster of galaxies (the lens itself) falls on the line of sight from the source to the observer. In some images, the brightness of the original source increases.
Relativists cite examples of distorted images of galaxies as evidence of GR-the effect of gravity on photons.
At the same time, they forget that the field of action of the GR effect is small angles near the surface of stars, where in fact this effect is not observed (eclipsing binaries). The difference in the scales of phenomena of real distortion of images of galaxies and mythical deviation near stars is10-11 times. I’ll give you an analogy. You can talk about the effect of surface tension on the shape of droplets, but you can’t seriously talk about the force of surface tension as the cause of ocean tides.
Ethereal physics finds the answer to the observed phenomenon of distortion of images of galaxies. This is the result of heating the Ether near galaxies, changing its density and, consequently, changing the speed of light at galactic distances due to the refraction of light in the Ether of different densities. Confirmation of the thermal nature of the distortion of images of galaxies is the direct connection of this distortion with the radio emission of space, that is, the Ether in this place, and the shift of the CMB spectrum in this direction to the high-frequency region.
How is the Olbers paradox resolved?
(Vadim Vydrankov, July 24, 2008, forum www.inauka.ru) Photometric paradox, Olbers ‘ paradox – one of the paradoxes of cosmology is that in a Universe evenly filled with stars, the brightness of the sky (including the night sky) should be approximately equal to the brightness of the solar disk. This must be the case because in any direction of the sky, the beam of vision will sooner or later rest on the surface of the star.
In other words, Olbers ‘ paradox is that if the universe is infinite, then we will not see a black sky, since the radiation of distant stars will be combined with the radiation of near ones, and the sky should have an average temperature of the photospheres of stars. When light is absorbed by interstellar matter, it will warm up to the temperature of the stellar photosphere and radiate as brightly as stars. However, the phenomenon of “light fatigue” comes into play.
What is “light fatigue”?
Tired light – the phenomenon of loss of energy by a quantum of electromagnetic radiation during the passage of cosmic distances, the same as the redshift effect of the spectrum of distant galaxies, discovered by Edwin Hubble in 1926.
In fact, quanta of electromagnetic waves, passing billions of light-years, give their energy to the Ether, “empty space”, since it is a real physical medium-a carrier of electromagnetic vibrations with non-zero viscosity or friction, and, therefore, vibrations in this medium should decay with the consumption of energy for friction. This friction is extremely small, and therefore the effect of” aging of light “or” Hubble redshift” is detected only at intergalactic distances. Thus, the light of distant stars cannot be combined with the light of near ones. Distant stars turn red, and very distant ones go into the radio range and cease to be visible at all. This is a real observable phenomenon of deep space astronomy.
The ether, having a monstrous heat capacity, subsequently gives its energy to the stars in the process of gravity. The so-called first law of thermodynamics, or correctly, the law of conservation of energy, is fully observed, but part of the energy passes into the Ether, which has a very low temperature of 2.7 ° K.
Can white dwarfs collapse over time? (Boris Andreev, 20 APR 2008)
– yes. In my opinion, which seems to be confirmed by observations, supernovae are a nuclear explosion of white (blue) dwarfs that have reached the conditions of a nuclear explosion-the critical mass of a chain reaction of atomic decay.
This applies at least to SN1a.
In addition to optical observations, this is confirmed by:
– precision sameness of the SN1a TNT equivalent, which is discussed in the articles “Eternal universe”,”Structure of celestial bodies ” and “Aether Temperature and redshifts”;
– the formation of pulsars (“neutron stars”) at the site OF an SN explosion, which is possible only if an explosion occurred in an absolutely spherical surface (layer) and the center of the star was compressed from all sides by hyperdress, crushing the atoms of matter into a single nuclear (neutron) matter, where the nucleons are tightly pressed together, and empty internuclear volumes occupied by electron shells are absent.
According to my point of view (the etheric paradigm), the matter of white dwarfs is in a super-compressed state, when the lower layers are in a “metasolid” phase state, that is, a super-compressed solid state. This is a kind of white dwarf lithosphere. Above that, the layers are in a “metafluid” state, i.e., in a super-compressed liquid state. This is the” hydrosphere ” of a white dwarf. Above is the thin atmosphere of a white dwarf observed by optical means.
Supernova explosion – has the following reason. In the” hydrosphere ” of a white (blue) dwarf, due to the very high strength of the gravitational field, elements and isotopes should be fractionated by specific gravity. This creates conditions for the formation of isotope layers with a critical decay mass. As soon as this mass is reached, a nuclear decay reaction of this layer occurs – an atomic explosion. This is a supernova explosion.
The ideal sphericity of the layer creates conditions for the cumulative compression of the Central part of the star to the collapse pressures of all the electron shells of atoms and the transition of matter to the” neutron ” state, that is, to the same state of matter that is inherent in it in the nuclei of atoms. This is the reason for the appearance of a pulsar at the site of a supernova.
Further observations with space-based telescopes should show this more clearly.